<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for politicsinarkansas.com</title>
	<atom:link href="http://politicsinarkansas.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://politicsinarkansas.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 16:47:31 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Lincoln tweets by Doc</title>
		<link>http://politicsinarkansas.com/2009/11/13/lincoln-tweets/comment-page-1/#comment-1761</link>
		<dc:creator>Doc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 16:47:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicsinarkansas.com/?p=1420#comment-1761</guid>
		<description>Senators who hate the idea of a public option for health insurance sure didn&#039;t have any problem voting for a public option to protect the profits of insurance companies against too many flood claims
 
Some blue dog House Democrats led by Stephanie Herseth Sandlin also oppose a public option. And when the Senate Finance Committee voted against including the option in its version of health care reform, Republicans were joined by a handful of Democrats including the committee chair, Max Baucus, who crafted the bill after conferring for weeks with the so-called “gang of six”: fellow Democrats Jeff Bingaman and Kent Conrad, Republicans Chuck Grassley, Mike Enzi and Olympia Snowe. The entire gang of six votes—casts their votes against the public option on Tuesday.
But each of them voted just last year in support of government-run insurance, that insurance however protects property. It is the National Flood Insurance Program created in 1968, because the free market decided it could not make money on that unpredictable risk called flooding. Government-run flood insurance is sold through private insurance companies but it is backed by the government and the government assumes all risk. Unlike the public option which relies on customer premiums, government flood insurance gets a subsidy—also known as a handout—from the government and it is mandatory for some people.
So given all the shouting over a public option, who could vote for mandatory taxpayer subsidized, anti- free market socialized flood insurance run by government bureaucrats? Every single politician I just named and most of Congress. Charles Boustany of Louisiana, along with 44 other Republicans, including going bipartisan on September 27th, 2007 to vote yea on the Flood Insurance Reform and Modernization Act. Karl Max applauded.
The entire “gang of six” on May 13th last year voting yea on the same act, quote, “to restore the solvency of the National Flood Insurance Program,” but also to expand socialized insurance to other property damage, quote, “to make available multi-peril coverage for damage resulting from windstorms and floods, and for other purposes.”
In the Senate where the public option is less popular than in the House, 92 senators voted to expand socialized property insurance. Consider the communist states that get the biggest handouts from socialized property insurance. North Carolina, Mississippi, Wisconsin, Florida, Illinois, Missouri, Indiana, Iowa, Louisiana, and the top socialized property insurance welfare state in the nation, “The People‘s Republic of Texas.” People‘s republic? Where 682,000 property owners have their handout for socialized property insurance, more than 36,000, scooping up $1.5 billion in claims last year alone.
Of course, it‘s not that some politicians don‘t care about the health of all Americans as much as they care about the wealth of those Americans who can‘t afford waterfront property. There is perhaps a less callous explanation: greed. It can‘t be principled because mandatory subsidized socialized property insurance is even more socialist than is the public option.
Preexisting conditions? No problem. You can get flood insurance even if you‘ve already been flooded, even if you‘ve chosen to live in a high-risk area, you can even get flood insurance after the diagnosis is in, even if you know there‘s a big rainfall or hurricane coming.
But what really matters to Congress is that insurance companies oppose the public option but they love mandatory socialized government-run property insurance.
According to the “New York Times,” Americas pay about $2.3 billion in flood premiums every year. Insurance companies get almost $1 billion out of that, almost half of it just for selling the policies, without a single dollar of their own at risk.
Congressional auditors found that private insurance companies make $327 million a year above their expenses.
So, thanks to the politicians who oppose the public option for people, we already have socialized government health care plans for the health of the insurance companies</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Senators who hate the idea of a public option for health insurance sure didn&#8217;t have any problem voting for a public option to protect the profits of insurance companies against too many flood claims</p>
<p>Some blue dog House Democrats led by Stephanie Herseth Sandlin also oppose a public option. And when the Senate Finance Committee voted against including the option in its version of health care reform, Republicans were joined by a handful of Democrats including the committee chair, Max Baucus, who crafted the bill after conferring for weeks with the so-called “gang of six”: fellow Democrats Jeff Bingaman and Kent Conrad, Republicans Chuck Grassley, Mike Enzi and Olympia Snowe. The entire gang of six votes—casts their votes against the public option on Tuesday.<br />
But each of them voted just last year in support of government-run insurance, that insurance however protects property. It is the National Flood Insurance Program created in 1968, because the free market decided it could not make money on that unpredictable risk called flooding. Government-run flood insurance is sold through private insurance companies but it is backed by the government and the government assumes all risk. Unlike the public option which relies on customer premiums, government flood insurance gets a subsidy—also known as a handout—from the government and it is mandatory for some people.<br />
So given all the shouting over a public option, who could vote for mandatory taxpayer subsidized, anti- free market socialized flood insurance run by government bureaucrats? Every single politician I just named and most of Congress. Charles Boustany of Louisiana, along with 44 other Republicans, including going bipartisan on September 27th, 2007 to vote yea on the Flood Insurance Reform and Modernization Act. Karl Max applauded.<br />
The entire “gang of six” on May 13th last year voting yea on the same act, quote, “to restore the solvency of the National Flood Insurance Program,” but also to expand socialized insurance to other property damage, quote, “to make available multi-peril coverage for damage resulting from windstorms and floods, and for other purposes.”<br />
In the Senate where the public option is less popular than in the House, 92 senators voted to expand socialized property insurance. Consider the communist states that get the biggest handouts from socialized property insurance. North Carolina, Mississippi, Wisconsin, Florida, Illinois, Missouri, Indiana, Iowa, Louisiana, and the top socialized property insurance welfare state in the nation, “The People‘s Republic of Texas.” People‘s republic? Where 682,000 property owners have their handout for socialized property insurance, more than 36,000, scooping up $1.5 billion in claims last year alone.<br />
Of course, it‘s not that some politicians don‘t care about the health of all Americans as much as they care about the wealth of those Americans who can‘t afford waterfront property. There is perhaps a less callous explanation: greed. It can‘t be principled because mandatory subsidized socialized property insurance is even more socialist than is the public option.<br />
Preexisting conditions? No problem. You can get flood insurance even if you‘ve already been flooded, even if you‘ve chosen to live in a high-risk area, you can even get flood insurance after the diagnosis is in, even if you know there‘s a big rainfall or hurricane coming.<br />
But what really matters to Congress is that insurance companies oppose the public option but they love mandatory socialized government-run property insurance.<br />
According to the “New York Times,” Americas pay about $2.3 billion in flood premiums every year. Insurance companies get almost $1 billion out of that, almost half of it just for selling the policies, without a single dollar of their own at risk.<br />
Congressional auditors found that private insurance companies make $327 million a year above their expenses.<br />
So, thanks to the politicians who oppose the public option for people, we already have socialized government health care plans for the health of the insurance companies</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Lincoln tweets by tsudo</title>
		<link>http://politicsinarkansas.com/2009/11/13/lincoln-tweets/comment-page-1/#comment-1760</link>
		<dc:creator>tsudo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Nov 2009 06:33:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicsinarkansas.com/?p=1420#comment-1760</guid>
		<description>How do I put this politely?

Do you think a link to the actual twitter account would be helpful? Hyperlinks make the world go round.

As an aside, it would be nice if I didn&#039;t have to register another username and password just to leave a comment. Check out Disqus for allowing people to comment.

Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How do I put this politely?</p>
<p>Do you think a link to the actual twitter account would be helpful? Hyperlinks make the world go round.</p>
<p>As an aside, it would be nice if I didn&#8217;t have to register another username and password just to leave a comment. Check out Disqus for allowing people to comment.</p>
<p>Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Grave concern by sherryg3</title>
		<link>http://politicsinarkansas.com/2009/09/22/grave-concern/comment-page-1/#comment-1759</link>
		<dc:creator>sherryg3</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2009 21:52:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicsinarkansas.com/?p=1349#comment-1759</guid>
		<description>HealthCARE FOR AMERICA?

ARE YOU SURE THIS ISN&#039;t FUNDED WITH OUR TAX DOLLARS?
that is against the law.  Will be FOI to check this out!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>HealthCARE FOR AMERICA?</p>
<p>ARE YOU SURE THIS ISN&#8217;t FUNDED WITH OUR TAX DOLLARS?<br />
that is against the law.  Will be FOI to check this out!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Lincoln: Transparency matters by Dusty Foster</title>
		<link>http://politicsinarkansas.com/2009/10/06/lincoln-transparency-matters/comment-page-1/#comment-1758</link>
		<dc:creator>Dusty Foster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Oct 2009 11:53:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicsinarkansas.com/?p=1384#comment-1758</guid>
		<description>There are people from all over the country who are working to show which DC politicians are hiking our taxes and removing our freedoms.

These Vote Trackers are filling out individual one-page charts for their state showing how their federal politicians have voted on major bills. 

A few months before election time, people from every state will download the chart for their state and pass them around. The chart can be taken into the voting booth so people can see at a glance exactly who voted for what. 

We currently do not have anyone from Arkansas creating a chart for this great state. 
It&#039;s very easy to do and everything you need is right on this website. 

Check it out:
http://www.votetrackers.com
-Dusty</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are people from all over the country who are working to show which DC politicians are hiking our taxes and removing our freedoms.</p>
<p>These Vote Trackers are filling out individual one-page charts for their state showing how their federal politicians have voted on major bills. </p>
<p>A few months before election time, people from every state will download the chart for their state and pass them around. The chart can be taken into the voting booth so people can see at a glance exactly who voted for what. </p>
<p>We currently do not have anyone from Arkansas creating a chart for this great state.<br />
It&#8217;s very easy to do and everything you need is right on this website. </p>
<p>Check it out:<br />
<a href="http://www.votetrackers.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.votetrackers.com</a><br />
-Dusty</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Grave concern by Melissa</title>
		<link>http://politicsinarkansas.com/2009/09/22/grave-concern/comment-page-1/#comment-1722</link>
		<dc:creator>Melissa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2009 02:50:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicsinarkansas.com/?p=1349#comment-1722</guid>
		<description>The ad captures the very heart of the healthcare debate. It is the image of reality for people with pre existing conditions, the unemployed, people cut off by insurance once it&#039;s decided they cost too much to care for... Or despite the fact they faithfully paid premieums for thirty years, they just had a heart attack... no more insurance. Full price for you until you can no longer afford it and that comes very quickly. If you are working class, charity and government programs will not help you. You find yourself with no medical care and very sick. Getting more sick.

The picture is very appropriate.

How do I know? I was healthy and got sick. Now I have no insurance. Now I&#039;m really sick.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The ad captures the very heart of the healthcare debate. It is the image of reality for people with pre existing conditions, the unemployed, people cut off by insurance once it&#8217;s decided they cost too much to care for&#8230; Or despite the fact they faithfully paid premieums for thirty years, they just had a heart attack&#8230; no more insurance. Full price for you until you can no longer afford it and that comes very quickly. If you are working class, charity and government programs will not help you. You find yourself with no medical care and very sick. Getting more sick.</p>
<p>The picture is very appropriate.</p>
<p>How do I know? I was healthy and got sick. Now I have no insurance. Now I&#8217;m really sick.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Grave concern by Melissa</title>
		<link>http://politicsinarkansas.com/2009/09/22/grave-concern/comment-page-1/#comment-1721</link>
		<dc:creator>Melissa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2009 01:32:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicsinarkansas.com/?p=1349#comment-1721</guid>
		<description>Good job to the advertising team, this gets right to the point. Too many Americans fortunate enough to get insurance through an employer, Americans fortunate enough to be healthy enough for insurance are popping off at the mouth about something they don&#039;t even bother to understand.

When the insurance company says no to a person, that person very often ends up dead. And they said Democrats wanted death panels??? INSURANCE COMPANIES ARE DEATH PANELS. And every single American is one illness or car accident or an unemployment line away from being uninsured. No one&#039;s healthcare is safe. Fabulous ad!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good job to the advertising team, this gets right to the point. Too many Americans fortunate enough to get insurance through an employer, Americans fortunate enough to be healthy enough for insurance are popping off at the mouth about something they don&#8217;t even bother to understand.</p>
<p>When the insurance company says no to a person, that person very often ends up dead. And they said Democrats wanted death panels??? INSURANCE COMPANIES ARE DEATH PANELS. And every single American is one illness or car accident or an unemployment line away from being uninsured. No one&#8217;s healthcare is safe. Fabulous ad!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Speaker Wills, trade ambassador by Robbie Rocks</title>
		<link>http://politicsinarkansas.com/2009/09/08/house-speakers-signs-agreement-with-chinese-officials/comment-page-1/#comment-1658</link>
		<dc:creator>Robbie Rocks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2009 20:19:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicsinarkansas.com/?p=1341#comment-1658</guid>
		<description>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jz1uDvQArLc</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jz1uDvQArLc" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jz1uDvQArLc</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Baker challenge remarkable by Cabela Night Elf Hunter LVL 80</title>
		<link>http://politicsinarkansas.com/2009/09/01/baker-challenge-remarkable/comment-page-1/#comment-1634</link>
		<dc:creator>Cabela Night Elf Hunter LVL 80</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 18:56:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicsinarkansas.com/?p=1326#comment-1634</guid>
		<description>18Zulu

It was actually at Iron Forge.  Alliance of course.  I take offense at your comments toward World of Warcraft.  I figured you for a Horde.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>18Zulu</p>
<p>It was actually at Iron Forge.  Alliance of course.  I take offense at your comments toward World of Warcraft.  I figured you for a Horde.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Baker challenge remarkable by 18Zulu</title>
		<link>http://politicsinarkansas.com/2009/09/01/baker-challenge-remarkable/comment-page-1/#comment-1632</link>
		<dc:creator>18Zulu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 12:09:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicsinarkansas.com/?p=1326#comment-1632</guid>
		<description>Where was this rally?

Hanging out on World of Warcraft doesn&#039;t count.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Where was this rally?</p>
<p>Hanging out on World of Warcraft doesn&#8217;t count.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Baker challenge remarkable by Eunice</title>
		<link>http://politicsinarkansas.com/2009/09/01/baker-challenge-remarkable/comment-page-1/#comment-1629</link>
		<dc:creator>Eunice</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2009 23:56:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicsinarkansas.com/?p=1326#comment-1629</guid>
		<description>Once again, it is laughable how little you do your homework. There is a declared independent candidate, Trevor Drown, who is continuing to gather support in &quot;them thar hills.&quot; I was at a large event last weekend and watched a fresh new approach from a leader who spent his time listening to people and their concerns. A man who has fought for us as a Green Beret in Afghanistan, a small business owner, and a concerned  father.  Trevor Drown is a true son of Arkansas who wants to lead, be a voice of the people and will not be an elected politician. 

 You also failed to factor in the effect the Green Party candidate will have. But that fine, keep ignoring the obvious and stay with the two party mindset. It is fun to see the state GOP consume themselves and battle it out. In the meantime, Trevor Drown will continue along gathering supporters listening to all the Arkies and presenting the message of a Common man working with and the common people.
One day, you will wake up and notice and then it will be too late.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Once again, it is laughable how little you do your homework. There is a declared independent candidate, Trevor Drown, who is continuing to gather support in &#8220;them thar hills.&#8221; I was at a large event last weekend and watched a fresh new approach from a leader who spent his time listening to people and their concerns. A man who has fought for us as a Green Beret in Afghanistan, a small business owner, and a concerned  father.  Trevor Drown is a true son of Arkansas who wants to lead, be a voice of the people and will not be an elected politician. </p>
<p> You also failed to factor in the effect the Green Party candidate will have. But that fine, keep ignoring the obvious and stay with the two party mindset. It is fun to see the state GOP consume themselves and battle it out. In the meantime, Trevor Drown will continue along gathering supporters listening to all the Arkies and presenting the message of a Common man working with and the common people.<br />
One day, you will wake up and notice and then it will be too late.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
